Research repository ArXiv will ban authors for a year if they let AI do all the work

arXiv Cracks Down on Unchecked AI-Generated Research

arXiv, the leading open-access repository for preprints in fields like computer science and mathematics, is strengthening its stance against misuse of large language models (LLMs) in scholarly papers. While preprints on arXiv are not peer-reviewed, the platform has a major influence on the flow of academic knowledge and research trends.

New Policies to Ensure Research Integrity

Under new guidelines announced by Thomas Dietterich, chair of arXiv’s computer science section, authors who submit papers containing clear signs of unchecked AI-generated content—such as fabricated citations or direct LLM prompts—may be barred from submitting to arXiv for one year. After the ban, further submissions will only be accepted if already approved by a reputable peer-reviewed journal or conference.

Dietterich stressed that these measures do not forbid the use of LLMs but require authors to take full responsibility for their work. Any errors, misleading statements, or inappropriate content copied from AI outputs must be carefully reviewed and corrected by the author before submission.

Verification and Appeals Process

This "one-strike" rule will only apply if arXiv moderators and section chairs confirm the evidence of unchecked AI use. Authors are also given the right to appeal decisions if they believe the penalty is unjustified.

Broader Context: AI's Growing Influence in Science

The new rules stem from rising concerns over the quality of research, with studies finding an increase in fake citations possibly due to LLM use. arXiv’s move to become an independent nonprofit also positions it better to address these evolving challenges in the academic landscape.

For details and the original article, visit TechCrunch.